|
Home Creeds
|
Luther's
95 Theses
(1517 AD)
Out of love and
concern for the truth, and with the object of eliciting it, the following
heads will be the subject of a public discussion at Wittenberg under the
presidency of the reverend father, Martin Luther, Augustinian, Master of
Arts and Sacred Theology, and duly appointed Lecturer on these subjects in
that place. He requests that whoever cannot be present personally to
debate the matter orally will do so in absence in writing.
- When
our Lord and Master, Jesus Christ, said "Repent", He called
for the entire life of believers to be one of penitence.
- The
word cannot be properly understood as referring to the sacrament of
penance, i.e. confession and satisfaction, as administered by the
clergy.
- Yet
its meaning is not restricted to penitence in one's heart; for such
penitence is null unless it produces outward signs in various
mortifications of the flesh.
- As
long as hatred of self abides (i.e. true inward penitence) the penalty
of sin abides, viz., until we enter the kingdom of heaven.
- The
pope has neither the will nor the power to remit any penalties beyond
those imposed either at his own discretion or by canon law.
- The
pope himself cannot remit guilt, but only declare and confirm that it
has been remitted by God; or, at most, he can remit it in cases
reserved to his discretion. Except for these cases, the guilt remains
untouched.
- God
never remits guilt to anyone without, at the same time, making humbly
submissive to the priest, His representative.
- The
penitential canons apply only to men who are still alive, and,
according to the canons themselves, none applies to the dead.
- Accordingly,
the Holy Spirit, acting in the person of the pope, manifests grace to
us, by the fact that the papal regulations always cease to apply at
death, or in any hard case.
- It
is a wrongful act, due to ignorance, when priests retain the canonical
penalties on the dead in purgatory.
- When
canonical penalties were changed and made to apply to purgatory,
surely it would seem that tares were sown while the bishops were
asleep.
- In
former days, the canonical penalties were imposed, not after, but
before absolution was pronounced; and were intended to be tests of
true contrition.
- Death
puts and end to all the claims of the Church; even the dying are
already dead to the canon laws, and are no longer bound by them.
- Defective
piety or love in a dying person is necessarily accompanied by great
fear, which is greatest where the piety or love is least.
- This
fear or horror is sufficient in itself, whatever else might be said,
to constitute the pain of purgatory, since it approaches very closely
to the horror of despair.
- There
seems to be the same difference between hell, purgatory, and heaven as
between despair, uncertainty, and assurance.
- Of
a truth, the pains of souls in purgatory ought to be abated, and
charity ought to be proportionately increased.
- Moreover,
it does not seem proved, on any grounds of reason or Scripture, that
these souls are outside the state of merit, or unable to grow in
grace.
- Nor
does it seem proved to be always the case that they are certain and
assured of salvation, even if we are very certain ourselves.
- Therefore
the pope, in speaking of the plenary remission of all penalties, does
not mean "all" in the strict sense, but only those imposed
by himself.
- Hence
those who preach indulgences are in error when they say that a man is
absolved and saved from every penalty by the pope's indulgences;
- Indeed,
he cannot remit to souls in purgatory any penalty which canon law
declares should be suffered in the present life.
- If
plenary remission could be granted to anyone at all, it would be only
in the cases of the most perfect, i.e. to very few.
- It
must therefore be the case that the major part of the people are
deceived by that indiscriminate and high-sounding promise of relief
from penalty.
- The
same power as the pope exercises in general over purgatory is
exercised in particular by every single bishop in his bishopric and
priest in his parish.
- The
pope does excellently when he grants remission to the souls in
purgatory on account of intercessions made on their behalf, and not by
the power of the keys (which he cannot exercise for them).
- There
is no divine authority for preaching that the soul flies out of the
purgatory immediately the money clinks in the bottom of the chest.
- It
is certainly possible that when the money clinks in the bottom of the
chest avarice and greed increase; but when the church offers
intercession, all depends in the will of God.
- Who
knows whether all souls in purgatory wish to be redeemed in view of
what is said of St. Severinus and St. Pascal? (Note: Paschal I, pope
817-24. The legend is that he and Severinus were willing to endure the
pains of purgatory for the benefit of the faithful).
- No
one is sure if the reality of his own contrition, much less of
receiving plenary forgiveness.
- One
who, bona fide, buys indulgence is a rare as a bona fide penitent man,
i.e. very rare indeed.
- All
those who believe themselves certain of their own salvation by means
if letters of indulgence, will be eternally damned, together with
their teachers.
- We
should be most carefully on our guard against those who say that the
papal indulgences are an inestimable divine gift, and that a man is
reconciled to God by them.
- For
the grace conveyed by these indulgences relates simply to the
penalties of the sacramental "satisfactions" decreed merely
by man.
- It
is not in accordance with Christian doctrines to preach and teach that
those who buy off souls, or purchase confessional licenses, have no
need to repent of their own sins.
- Any
Christian whatsoever, who is truly repentant, enjoys plenary remission
from penalty and guilt, and this is given him without letters of
indulgence.
- Any
true Christian whatsoever, living or dead, participates in all the
benefits of Christ and the Church; and this participation is granted
to him by God without letters of indulgence.
- Yet
the pope's remission and dispensation are in no way to be despised,
form as already said, they proclaim the divine remission.
- It
is very difficult, even for the most learned theologians, to extol to
the people the great bounty contained in the indulgences, while, at
the same time, praising contrition as a virtue.
- A
truly contrite sinner seeks out, and loves to pay, the penalties of
his sins; whereas the very multitude of indulgences dulls men's
consciences, and tends to make them hate the penalties.
- Papal
indulgences should only be preached with caution, lest people gain a
wrong understanding, and think that they are preferable to other good
works: those of love.
- Christians
should be taught that the pope does not at all intend that the
purchase of indulgences should be understood as at all comparable with
the works of mercy.
- Christians
should be taught that one who gives to the poor, or lends to the
needy, does a better action than if he purchases indulgences.
- Because,
by works of love, love grows and a man becomes a better man; whereas,
by indulgences, he does not become a better man, but only escapes
certain penalties.
- Christians
should be taught that he who sees a needy person, but passes him by
although he gives money for indulgences, gains no benefit from the
pope's pardon, but only incurs the wrath of God.
- Christians
should be taught that, unless they have more than they need, they are
bound to retain what is only necessary for the upkeep of their home,
and should in no way squander it on indulgences.
- Christians
should be taught that they purchase indulgences voluntarily, and are
not under obligation to do so.
- Christians
should be taught that, in granting indulgences, the pope has more
need, and more desire, for devout prayer on his own behalf than for
ready money.
- Christians
should be taught that the pope's indulgences are useful only if one
does not rely on them, but most harmful if one loses the fear of God
through them.
- Christians
should be taught that, if the pope knew the exactions of the
indulgence-preachers, he would rather the church of St. Peter were
reduced to ashes than be built with the skin, flesh, and bones of the
sheep.
- Christians
should be taught that the pope would be willing, as he ought if
necessity should arise, to sell the church of St. Peter, and give,
too, his own money to many of those whom the pardon-merchants conjure
money.
- It
is vain to rely on salvation by letters if indulgence, even if the
commissary, or indeed the pope himself, were to pledge his own soul
for their validity.
- Those
are enemies of Christ and the pope who forbid the word of God to be
preached at all in some churches, in order that indulgences may be
preached in others.
- The
word of God suffers injury if, in the same sermon, an equal or longer
time is devoted to indulgences than to that word.
- The
pope cannot help taking the view that if indulgences (very small
matters) are celebrated by one bell, one pageant, or one ceremony, the
gospel (a very great matter) should be preached to the accompaniment
of a hundred bells, a hundred processions, a hundred ceremonies.
- The
treasures of the church, out of which the pope dispenses indulgences,
are not sufficiently spoken of or known among the people of Christ.
- That
these treasures are note temporal are clear from the fact that many of
the merchants do not grant them freely, but only collect them.
- Nor
are they the merits of Christ and the saints, because, even apart from
the pope, these merits are always working grace in the inner man, and
working the cross, death, and hell in the outer man.
- St.
Laurence said that the poor were the treasures of the church, but he
used the term in accordance with the custom of his own time.
- We
do not speak rashly in saying that the treasures of the church are the
keys of the church, and are bestowed by the merits of Christ.
- For
it is clear that the power of the pope suffices, by itself, for the
remission of penalties and reserved cases.
- The
true treasure of the church is the Holy gospel of the glory and the
grace of God.
- It
is right to regard this treasure as most odious, for it makes the
first to be the last.
- On
the other hand, the treasure of indulgences is most acceptable, for it
makes the last to be the first.
- Therefore
the treasures of the gospel are nets which, in former times, they used
to fish for men of wealth.
- The
treasures of the indulgences are the nets to-day which they use to
fish for men of wealth.
- The
indulgences, which the merchants extol as the greatest of favors, are
seen to be, in fact, a favorite means for money-getting.
- Nevertheless,
they are not to be compared with the grace of God and the compassion
shown in the Cross.
- Bishops
and curates, in duty bound, must receive the commissaries of the papal
indulgences with all reverence;
- But
they are under a much greater obligation to watch closely and attend
carefully lest these men preach their own fancies instead of what the
pope commissioned.
- Let
him be anathema and accursed who denies the apostolic character of the
indulgences.
- On
the other hand, let him be blessed who is on his guard against the
wantonness and license of the pardon-merchant's words.
- In
the same way, the pope rightly excommunicates those who make any plans
to the detriment of the trade in indulgences.
- It
is much more in keeping with his views to excommunicate those who use
the pretext of indulgences to plot anything to the detriment of holy
love and truth.
- It
is foolish to think that papal indulgences have so much power that
they can absolve a man even if he has done the impossible and violated
the mother of God.
- We
assert the contrary, and say that the pope's pardons are not able to
remove the least venial of sins as far as their guilt is concerned.
- When
it is said that not even St. Peter, if he were now pope, could grant a
greater grace, it is blasphemy against St. Peter and the pope.
- We
assert the contrary, and say that he, and any pope whatever, possesses
greater graces, viz., the gospel, spiritual powers, gifts of healing,
etc., as is declared in 1
Corinthians.
12.
- It
is blasphemy to say that the insignia of the cross with the papal arms
are of equal value to the cross on which Christ died.
- The
bishops, curates, and theologians, who permit assertions of that kind
to be made to the people without let or hindrance, will have to answer
for it.
- This
unbridled preaching of indulgences makes it difficult for learned men
to guard the respect due to the pope against false accusations, or at
least from the keen criticisms of the laity;
- They
ask, e.g.: Why does not the pope liberate everyone from purgatory for
the sake of love (a most holy thing) and because of the supreme
necessity of their souls? This would be morally the best of all
reasons. Meanwhile he redeems innumerable souls for money, a most
perishable thing, with which to build St. Peter's church, a very minor
purpose.
- Again:
Why should funeral and anniversary masses for the dead continue to be
said? And why does not the pope repay, or permit to be repaid, the
benefactions instituted for these purposes, since it is wrong to pray
for those souls who are now redeemed?
- Again:
Surely this is a new sort of compassion, on the part of God and the
pope, when an impious man, an enemy of God, is allowed to pay money to
redeem a devout soul, a friend of God; while yet that devout and
beloved soul is not allowed to be redeemed without payment, for love's
sake, and just because of its need of redemption.
- Again:
Why are the penitential canon laws, which in fact, if not in practice,
have long been obsolete and dead in themselves,-why are they, to-day,
still used in imposing fines in money, through the granting of
indulgences, as if all the penitential canons were fully operative?
- Again:
since the pope's income to-day is larger than that of the wealthiest
of wealthy men, why does he not build this one church of St. Peter
with his own money, rather than with the money of indigent believers?
- Again:
What does the pope remit or dispense to people who, by their perfect
penitence, have a right to plenary remission or dispensation?
- Again:
Surely a greater good could be done to the church if the pope were to
bestow these remissions and dispensations, not once, as now, but a
hundred times a day, for the benefit of any believer whatever.
- What
the pope seeks by indulgences is not money, but rather the salvation
of souls; why then does he not suspend the letters and indulgences
formerly conceded, and still as efficacious as ever?
- These
questions are serious matters of conscience to the laity. To suppress
them by force alone, and not to refute them by giving reasons, is to
expose the church and the pope to the ridicule of their enemies, and
to make Christian people unhappy.
- If
therefore, indulgences were preached in accordance with the spirit and
mind of the pope, all these difficulties would be easily overcome, and
indeed, cease to exist.
- Away,
then, with those prophets who say to Christ's people, "Peace,
peace," where in there is no peace.
- Hail,
hail to all those prophets who say to Christ's people, "The
cross, the cross," where there is no cross.
- Christians
should be exhorted to be zealous to follow Christ, their Head, through
penalties, deaths, and hells;
- And
let them thus be more confident of entering heaven through many
tribulations rather than through a false assurance of peace.
|